tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38372737.post4573034947309342929..comments2007-10-23T08:17:02.550-04:00Chris Buccherehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02230044241956019017noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38372737.post-69780304257007570052007-10-23T08:17:00.000-04:002007-10-23T08:17:00.000-04:00Hi Tim,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your feedback! Several people have suggested that we start supporting OPML, so you're not alone. In fact, it's one of the things that Scoble and I talked about in his video.<BR/><BR/>The problem with feedhaus and OPML is that we want you to manually tag <I>each feed</I>. Bulk upload through OPML doesn't really support this idea, which is why right now you have to add feeds one at a time.<BR/><BR/>However, I can envision a UI that would accept your OPML file and then ask you to supply a set of tags for each feed. This could be a pretty time consuming activity, especially if you, like Scoble, read hundreds of feeds. (He reads over 800.)<BR/><BR/>I read about 30 feeds on a regular basis, so I didn't have a problem with the one-by-one adding mechanism.<BR/><BR/>So I hope you can see our point of view <I>and</I> the point of the service. If we do figure out a reasonable way to support OPML, we'll certainly advertise it here. If you want to share your e-mail address, we can let you know via that mechanism as well.<BR/><BR/>Thanks again for your feedback!<BR/><BR/>Best regards,<BR/>ChrisChris Buccherehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02230044241956019017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38372737.post-68993013171834722892007-10-23T04:35:00.000-04:002007-10-23T04:35:00.000-04:00What's the point of this service if you can't add OPML lists of feeds?<BR/><BR/>TimTimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11722051517736340969noreply@blogger.com